US firm's Matakana homes plan draws strong response
29.12.2008
A Matakana Island elder has warned that only a bullet will stop him from entering land if it is subdivided into an exclusive hideaway for the rich.
Bob Rolleston has fired the first shots in an American-owned forestry company's plan to subdivide its 1920ha landholding on the forested side of Matakana Island.
If Blakely Pacific's application to Western Bay District Council succeeds, the 48-lot subdivision will allow the development of homes overlooking the ocean and harbour.
Mr Rolleston said the threatened break-up of the northern end of Matakana would deny Maori traditional access to a big chunk of the forest-covered island.
The 57-year-old kaumatua (elder) was born and bred on Matakana. He says he knows the old stories and most of the whakapapa of the island and its neighbouring Rangiwaea Island.
He said the forested side of Matakana was often used by Maori for pig hunting or as a way to reach the ocean beaches to fish and gather shellfish. This was permitted by Blakely Pacific.
But subdividing the land would completely change its character and was a radical shift from the status quo. Mr Rolleston said the new owners would talk legal ownership whereas he talked about whakapapa (genealogy) and Maori lore.
Mr Rolleston would take a hardline cultural position if the application succeeded, which could escalate into serious confrontation if others joined him.
``Nobody will ever stop me treading that land, and the only thing that will stop me is a bullet.
``It is my spiritual land, it is my bloodline, my connections, it is my heart _ it is everything that my body consumes.'
Mr Rolleston said his opinions reflected those of many of the island's Maori, whether they lived on Matakana or not. The majority were absolutely opposed to development.
The land proposed for subdivision was part of the area historically occupied by his hapu.
Mr Rolleston is a descendent of Ngai Tamawhareua, the hapu (subtribe) which is the kaitiaki (guardian) of the northern end of the island.
``Where they are planning to build is straight opposite Uretureture _ an ancient pa that belonged to our people.' Mr Rolleston is from Wikeepa whanau, an extended family directly descended from Tamawhareua hapu. Tamawhareua was the youngest son of Te Rangihouhiri and Pukai, the founder of Tauranga Moana's Ngaiterangi iwi (tribe). He is also a direct descendent of Hori Tupaea of Ngai Tauwhao hapu on Rangiwaea Island.
Mr Rolleston does not see ownership of the island in strictly legalistic terms, saying that Maori lore was as important as law.
``It is not about ownership, it is about whakapapa.' He said that for Maori families, whakapapa was the island in its entirety.
``For each and every one of us, the island is us and we are the island _ even those who go along with development of Matakana.
``We are the legacy left by our ancestors.'
He said the company's message from its meeting with hapu was that it would do what it had to do _ leaving hapu in the position of protecting their interests. Mr Rolleston has spent nearly all his adult life away from the island, but returns as often as possible.
Blakely Pacific managing director Phil Taylor said opposition to the plan was a concern in attracting buyers for the homes.
``It is one of the reasons we want to get them [the community] to support the application and not oppose us,' he said.
``If you have a disenfranchised community, who will want to live there?'
Mr Taylor said Blakely Pacific would not be ``firing any bullets' but the company needed to consider how to engage with Mr Rolleston and others.
``One of the issues is how you reconcile European-style freehold ownership with the concept of spiritual ownership. ``That is the challenging area and we need to work through it.'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
No matter where we are in the world the underlining fact where ownership of any lands is concerned is that the use or benefits from the use of such lands should only belong to any of the original occupants,their families first and foremost.Pakeha have in every historical land issue been at the forefront of most if not all land claims that they have taken by there own laws to benefit only the select few for monetary reasons only.Otherwise why would an island that has no monetary value be worth pursuing?We(my Grandmother was born and raised on Matakana Island)on the other hand being of direct descendants are the true caretakers of that land and the sea around it.How would pakeha know of any cultural and spiritual connections to any land to which they were never born to?Would the Queen of England not be the who she is if all her ancestors before her not fort the Romans or French to just name a few to save what is now the Royal families rightful place of ownership?I will be the first to fire the first bullet to protect our land and prepared to die if necessary.What ever happens,Pakeha will never own our land no matter what courts give it to them.We are and always will be the true traditional owners FOREVER!Amen.
If Blakely Pacific's request for paid job to Western Bay District Council is winning, the 48-lot subdivision will sanction the development of households overlooking the marine waters and harbour.
Texas Ranches For Sale
Mr Rolleston said the vulnerable break-up of the north end of Matakana would renounce Maori conventional entry to to a very large chunk of the forest-covered islan.
Post a Comment